The Basic Categories and Assumptions for Contemporary Chinese Argumentation Studies

Zhou Qiang

Abstract


A systemic study of argumentation in

definition, stages, types, techniques, and

principles of argumentation has been reflected.

Based on this reflection, the basic assumptions

of contemporary Chinese argumentation studies

have been drawn upon. Finally, the underlying

reasons for the present situation have been

analyzed.


Keywords


contemporary Chinese argumentation studies; basic categories; basic assumptions; underlying reasons.



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18002/sin.v3i2.5261

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Zhou Qiang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Sinología hispánica. China Studies Review

Contacto: sinologiahispanica@unileon.es
Soporte técnico: journals@unileon.es

I.S.S.N. 2444-832X (Ed. impresa)

e-I.S.S.N. 2531-2219

             © Confucius Institute, University of Leon

                               © Authors