A process-sociology analysis of religious practices and Japanese martial arts

Raúl Sánchez García

doi:10.18002/rama.v18i1.7479

Authors

Raúl Sánchez García Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18002/rama.v18i1.7479

Keywords:

Religious practices, martial arts, Norbert Elias, civilising processes

Agencies:

The author received no funding for this work.

Abstract

This paper uses primary and secondary sources to provide a process-sociological analysis of the relationship between religious practices and Japanese martial arts. It problematises the taken for granted role of Zen Buddhism as the sole influence on the development of Japanese martial arts. Such essential connection is inaccurate and anachronistic. Religious and martial practices developed as part of processes of sociogenesis (state formation) and psychogenesis (habitus) during three different key stages: (1) Medieval Japan (1185-1600): during this stage, warriors (bushi) progressively became the predominant rulers across the country, enforcing law by sheer force. Warriors seasoned in combat used esoteric practices (spells, magic rituals) as part of their psychological arsenal for warfare, as practical means of action. The cult of the Buddhist deity Marishiten held special interest for the bushi originating martial traditions (ryu). (2) Tokugawa shogunate (1600-1848): the pacification of the country by the central military court implied a more detached approach to martial arts by samurai. Within this milieu, the samurai acted as a retainer/bureaucrat whose main mission was to keep order in a stratified society and to serve his lord, something that Zen practices helped to incorporate in the samurai ethos. (3) Early Showa period (1926-1945): this stage featured a progressive militarisation of people and the instigation of a strong involvement towards the Japanese nation, considered as the main (symbolic) survival unit. Budo (martial arts) was connected to shinto (functioning as a ‘state religion’) and embodied the imperial bushido message. Zen provided a legitimation of violence for citizen-soldiers with a personality structure that presented self-doubts on killing someone and fear of being killed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Métricas alternativas

Author Biography

Raúl Sánchez García, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Raúl Sánchez-García (Spain) is Lecturer at the Social Sciences department of the School of Sports Science (INEF), Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM). He is the secretary of the Sociology of Sport working group within the Spanish Federation of Sociology (FES) and co-editor of the academic journal Sociología del Deporte. His recent book The Historical Sociology of Japanese Martial Arts (2019) was awarded the Norbert Elias book Prize 2020. E-mail: raul.sanchezg@upm.es

References

Adolphson, M. (2007). The Teeth and Claws of the Buddha. University of Hawai’i Press.

Benesch, O. (2014). Inventing the Way of the Samurai: Nationalism, Internationalism, and Bushido in Modern Japan. Oxford University Press.

Benesch, O. (2016). Reconsidering Zen, Samurai, and the martial arts. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 14(17), Article ID 4921.

Bennett, A. (2015). Kendo: Culture of the sword. Univ of California Press.

Bodiford,W. (2005). Zen and Japanese Swordsmanship Reconsidered. In A. Bennett (ed.). Budo Perspectives (vol. 1, pp. 69-103). Kendo World Publications.

Borondo, V. (2021). Reflections about kata-part 1. European Jodo Federation. https://www.fej.ch/dl/Borondo_ReflectionsAboutKata-PartI.pdf

Deshimaru, T. (1977). Zen et arts martiaux. Seghers.

Elias, N. (2005). The Court Society. University College Dublin Press.

Elias, N. (2007). Involvement and Detachment. University College Dublin Press.

Elias, N. (2009). Essays I: On the Sociology of Knowledge and the Sciences. University College Dublin Press.

Elias, N. [1939] (2012). On the Process of Civilisation. University College Dublin Press.

Elias, N. (2013). Studies on the Germans. University College Dublin Press.

Friday, K. (1994). Bushido or Bull? A Medieval Historian’s Perspective on the Pacific War & the Japanese Military Tradition. The History Teacher, 27(3), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.2307/494774

Friday, K. (1999). Kabala in Motion: Kata and Pattern Practice in the Traditional Bugei. In D. Skoss (ed.), Sword & Spirit: Classical Warrior Traditions of Japan (Vol. 2) (pp. 151–170). Koryu Books,

Friday, K. (2004). Samurai, Warfare and the State in Early Medieval Japan. Routledge.

Friday, K. (2005). Off the Warpath: Military Science & Budo in the Evolution of Ryuha Bugei. In A. Bennett (ed.), Budo Perspectives (Vol. 1) (pp. 249-268). Kendo World Publications.

Gainty, D. (2013). Martial Arts and the Body Politic in Meiji Japan. Routledge.

Hall, D. (1997). Marishiten: Buddhist Influences on Combative Behavior. In D. Skoss (ed.), Koryu Bujutsu: Classical Warrior Traditions of Japan (pp. 87-120). Koryu Books.

Hall, D. (2014). The Buddhist Goddess Marishiten. A Study of the Evolution and Impact of her Cult on the Japanese Warrior. Global Oriental.

Horne, J. (2000). Understanding Sport and Body Culture in Japan. Body & Society,6(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006002004

Hurst III, C. (1998). Armed martial arts of Japan: Swordsmanship and archery. Yale University Press.

Ives, C. (2009). Imperial-Way Zen: Ichikawa Hakugen's Critique and Lingering Questions for Buddhist Ethics. University of Hawaii Press.

Kammer, R. (2016). Zen and Confucius in the Art of Swordsmanship: The'Tengu-geijutsu-ron'of Chozan Shissai. Routledge.

Keegan, J. (2004). The face of battle: A study of Agincourt, Waterloo and the Somme. Pimlico.

King, W. (1993). Zen and the way of the sword: Arming the samurai psyche. Oxford University Press.

Knutsen, R. (2011). Tengu: The Shamanic and Esoteric Origins of the Japanese Martial Arts. Global Oriental.

Loyal, S., & Quilley, S. (2020). State Formation, Habitus, and National Character: Elias, Bourdieu, Polanyi, and Gellner and the Case of Asylum Seekers in Ireland. Historical Social Research, 45(1), 226-261. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26873887

Masatoshi, H. (2011). The Gozan Zen Sects in the History of Japanese Buddhism. In A Selection of Essays on Oriental Studies of ICIS (pp. 29-46). Institute for Cultural Interaction Studies, Kansai University.

Mol, S. (2008). Invisible Armor: An Introduction to the Esoteric Dimension of Japan’s Classical Warrior Arts. Eibusha.

Otake, R. (2016). Strategy and the Art of Peace: Tenshin Sho-Den Katori Shinto-Ryu. Nippon Budokan Foundation.

Pita, G. (2014). Genealogía y transformación de la cultura bushi en Japón. Bellaterra.

Sánchez-García, R. (2019). The Historical Sociology of Japanese Martial Arts. Routledge.

Sánchez-García, R. (2018). Civilizing-decivilizing and formalizing-informalizing balances in figurational sociology: an example from the long term development of Japanese martial arts. In A. Ohira (ed), Civilization, Culture and Knowledge in Process (pp. 51-71). DTP.

Sánchez-García, R. (2022). Decivilising Offensives: Lessons from the Japanese Civilising Process. Presented at the conference 'Long-Term Processes in Human History: A Tribute to Johan Goudsblom'. KNAW, Amsterdam, 17-19 March.

Siniawer, E. (2008). Ruffians, Yakuza, Nationalists: The Violent Politics of Modern Japan, 1860–1960. Cornell University Press.

Victoria, B. [1997] (2006). Zen at war. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Victoria, B. (2002). Zen war stories. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Victoria, B. (2019). Zen terror in prewar Japan. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Vlastos, S. (Ed.). (1998). Mirror of modernity: invented traditions of modern Japan (Vol. 9). University of California Press.

Wouters, C. (2007). Informalization: Manners and Emotions since 1890. Sage.