China, una prolongación de la polémica sobre el Nuevo Mundo

Autores

  • María Isabel Viforcos Marinas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18002/ehgha.v0i20.6774

Palavras-chave:

China, evangelización, conquista, J. González de Mendoza, J. Acosta, P. Valencia, A. Sánchez

Resumo

After the discovery and colonization of The Philippines and particulary since the arrival of the first Augustinian and Franciscan missionaries, China, until then an unknown and inaccessible empire, became a focus of interest for humanists, traders and preachers. The approach to the Ming Empire renewed the controversy about the just titles of the conquest of the Spanish Crown and the conditions of lawful war to remove the obstacles to trade and preaching. This article gives a brief synthesis of both conflicting attitudes: the one defended by the Augustinian González de Mendoza, the Jesuit José de Acosta and the Humanist Pedro Valencia is based on mutual respect and the rejection of any kind of violence against the Empire; the other is supported by the factor Juan Bautista Román and the Jesuit Alonso Sánchez in favour of military action justified by the obstinacy of the Emperor and the Mandarins and their policy of close borders to ideas and foreing people.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Publicado

1998-12-01

Como Citar

Viforcos Marinas, M. I. (1998). China, una prolongación de la polémica sobre el Nuevo Mundo. Estudios humanísticos. Geografía, historia y arte, (20), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.18002/ehgha.v0i20.6774

Edição

Seção

Estudios