A fusão das filosofias orientais e ocidentais no Idokan Karaté
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18002/rama.v18i2.6201Palavras-chave:
Artes marciais, desportos de combate, filosofia, ética, religião, taoísmo, cristandadeEntidades:
The authors received no funding for this workResumo
Cada escola da arte marcial japonesa de karaté possui valores e regras especiais, únicos para a sua prática. Assim, a filosofia do Idokan Karaté é semelhante à de outras escolas, bem como diferente, na miríade de práticas marciais. O Idokan Karaté tem uma filosofia prática (ou seja, aplicável ao quotidiano) influenciada por sistemas de crenças orientais e ocidentais, que os seus praticantes internalizam e utilizam na esfera civil como formas atuais do caminho do guerreiro. Este estudo de caso único examina a ética, os valores e as principais regras do Idokan, e também detalha o seu conteúdo específico e simbólico. Através do método de pesquisa fenomenológica hermenêutica, apresenta uma análise de conteúdo da literatura sobre o Idokan, dentro do discurso mais amplo dos estudos das artes marciais, realizando uma ampla análise discursiva desses temas, tanto em estudos científicos quanto em publicações informativas. Ao fazê-lo, as implicações práticas deste estudo são que ele não apenas oferece um vislumbre da singularidade da filosofia Idokan Karate, mas também da enorme e maravilhosa diversidade das artes marciais. A filosofia do Idokan Karaté deriva, claramente, da compreensão dos seus fundadores das artes marciais chinesas e japonesas, taoísmo e cristianismo, e dita uma moralidade única para os praticantes. Tal teleologia decorre de valores, regras e objetivos especiais, que estão embutidos nos ensinamentos Idokan. Na ética normativa, o Decálogo e a nobreza de espírito (Homo Creator Nobilis) são os mais importantes. O Tao no Idokan é entendido como a Palavra de Deus, o princípio do amor e o caminho para o céu (cristão).
Downloads
Métricas alternativas
Referências
Bryant, S. R. (2019). Fighting with no one: Reflections on education, aikido, and peace. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 19(2), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.19.2.4
Burrow, S. (2014). Martial arts and moral life. In G. Priest & D. Young (Eds.), Philosophy and the Martial Arts (pp. 50-67). Routledge.
Cieszkowski, S., & Sieber, L. (2006). Far Eastern martial arts in the perspective of culture sciences. International Journal of Eastern Sports & Physical Education, 4(1), 217-226.
Cihounkova, J., & Reguli, Z. (2016). The path of karate. In J. A. Vianna (Ed.), Karate: Bases Para o Treinamento (pp. 17-37). Revolucao Ebook.
Clapton, N., & Hiskey, S. (2020). Radically embodied compassion: The potential role of traditional martial arts in compassion cultivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 555156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555156
Cynarski, W. J. (2007). Stoic philosophy of Asiatic martial arts. In J. Kosiewicz (Ed.), Social and Cultural Aspects of Sport (pp. 114-131). AWF.
Cynarski W. J. (2009). Martial Arts – Idō & Idōkan. Idokan Poland Association.
Cynarski, W.J. (2013). General reflections about the philosophy of martial arts. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 13(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.13.3.1
Cynarski, W. J. (2016a). A Christian and the martial arts path. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 16(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.16.2.1
Cynarski, W. J. (2016b). The way of truth. Towards the philosophy of self-creation. Rozprawy Naukowe Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu (Scientific dissertations of the University of Physical Education in Wrocław), 54, 3-13.
Cynarski, W. J. (2017). The philosophy of martial arts – the example of the concept of Ido. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica, 53(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.14712/23366052.2017.7
Cynarski, W. J., Błażejewski, W., & Pasterniak, W. (2016). Pedagogika nowoparadygmatyczna. W poszukiwaniu nowych inspiracji i aplikacji pedagogicznych (New Paradigmatic Pedagogy: In Search of New Inspiration and Pedagogical Applications). Rzeszów University Press.
Cynarski, W. J., & Sieber, L. (2016). 40 Years of Zendo Karate Tao-Te-Tao and Idokan Karate (1975-2015). Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 16(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.16.1.2
Cynarski, W. J., Skowron, J. (2014). An analysis of the conceptual language used for the general theory of martial arts – Japanese, Polish and English terminology. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 14(3), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.14.3.7
Cynarski, W. J., & Szajna, G. (2017). The nobility of spirit – Homo Creator Nobilis. Towards the anthropology of the knightly way. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 17(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.17.1.1
Cynarski, W. J., Yu, J. H., & Borysiuk, Z. (2017). Technical forms in teaching karate and taekwondo. Journal of Combat Sports and Martial Arts, 8(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.4619
Cynarski, W. J., Yu, J. H., Warchol, K., & Bartik, P. (2015). Martial arts in psycho-physical culture. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 15(4), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.15.4.5
Funakoshi, G. (1975). Karate-do: My way of life. Kodansha.
Guillen, D. E. F. (2019). Qualitative research: Hermeneutical phenomenological method. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(1): 201-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267
Ikeda, T. (2013). Teaching content and method of judo in regular school lessons before World War II: A study of the process of their establishment [in Japanese]. Research Journal of Budo, 45(3), 159-1771.
Idokan Poland Association (IPA). (2023). Działalność Stowarzyszenia Idokan Polska (SIP) (Activities of the Idokan Poland Association [IPA]). www.idokan.pl/dzia%C5%82alnosc.html
Jahnke, P. K. (1992). Zen-Do karate “Tai-te-tao.” München.
Jakhel, R., & Pieter, W. (2013). Changes in primary motives of karate beginners between 1970-1999. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 13(1), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.13.1.7
John Paul II. (2005). Pamięć i tożsamość. Rozmowy na przełomie tysiącleci (Memory and identity: Talks at the turn of the millennium). Znak.
Johnson, J. A. (2017). From technique to way: An investigation into taekwondo’s pedagogical process. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 17(4), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.17.4.2
Johnson, J. A., & Ha, P. (2015). Elucidating pedagogical objectives for combat systems, martial arts, and combat sports. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 15(4), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.15.4.9
Johnson, J. A., & Lewis, S. (2021). ITF Taekwon-Do’s General Choi Hong Hi: A Peace Profile. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 21(4), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.21.4.8
Johnson, N. C. G. (2012). The Japanization of Karate?: Placing an Intangible Cultural Practice. Journal of Contemporary Anthropology 3(1), 60-78.
Jones, G. W., Mackay, K. S., Peters, D. M. (2006). Participation motivation in martial artists in the West Midlands region of England. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 5(CSSI), 28-34.
Kakkori, L. (2009). Hermeneutics and phenomenology problems when applying hermeneutic phenomenological method in educational qualitative research. Paideusis, 18(2), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.7202/1072329ar
Kano, J. (2005). Mind over muscle: Writings from the founder of judo. (N. H. Ross, trans.) Kodansha.
Kim, D. S., & Bäck, A. (2022). Martial meditation: Philosophy and the Essence of the Martial Arts (J. A. Johnson, Ed.). iACT Publishing.
Kodokan. (2009). Jigoro Kano and the Kodokan: An Innovative Response to Modernisation (A. Bennett, Ed. & Trans.). Shūsansha.
Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE.
Lewis S. R. C. (2016). Promoting peace, practising war: Mohism’s resolution of the paradoxical ethics of war and self-defence in East Asian martial arts [Doctoral dissertation, Kyung Hee University]. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
Mayen, J., Johnson, J. A., & Bosch, R. M. (2015). Taekwondo as one’s life philosophy. Journal of the International Association for Taekwondo Research, 2(1), 24-29.
Messaoud, W. B. (2016). Karate, and the perception of the sport. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 16(3), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.16.3.6
Miles, M., Francis, K., Chapman, Y., & Taylor, B. 2013. Hermeneutic phenomenology: A methodology of choice for midwives. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 19(4), 409-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12082
Nitobe, I. (1906). Bushido, the soul of Japan (10th edition). Knickerbocker Press.
Oyama, M. (1979). The Kyokushin way. Mas. Oyama’s karate philosophy. Japan Publications Inc.
Peterson, W. R. (2008). Bushido’s role in the growth of Pre-World War II Japanese nationalism. Journal of Asian Martial Arts, 17(3), 8-21.
Rosa, V. A. V. (2012). “Samurais” in modern Europe: motivations and understandings of Portuguese karatecas. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 12(2), 11-19.
Sánchez García, R. (2023). A process-sociology analysis of religious practices and Japanese martial arts. Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 18(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.18002/rama.v18i1.7479
Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, epicureans and sceptics. An introduction to Hellenic Philosophy. Routledge.
Shishida, F., & Flynn, S. M. (2013). How does the philosophy of martial arts manifest itself? Insights from Japanese martial arts. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 13(3), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.13.3.5
Sieber, L., Cynarski, W. J., Słopecki, J., & Ziemiński, P. (2009). Patriotic education through Budō and combat sports: On the example of Idōkan Poland Association. In W. J. Cynarski (Ed.), Martial Arts and Combat Sports: Humanistic Outlook (pp. 137-144). Rzeszów University Press.
Stefanek, K. A. (2004). An exploration of participation motives among collegiate taekwondo participants [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. MSU Libraries Digital Repository.
Takagi, T. (1984). A comparison of bushido and chivalry (T. Matsuno, trans.). TM International.
Thiel, A., John, J., & Frahsa, A. (2019). Qualitative interviews in sport and physical actrivity research – do not forget the body. European Journal for Sport and Society, 16(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2019.1616423
Tokarski, S. (1989). Sztuki walki. Ruchowe formy filozofii Wschodu (Martial arts. Movement forms of Eastern philosophy). Glob.
Warner, G. & Draeger, D. (1993). Japanese swordsmanship: Technique and practice. Weatherhill.
Znaniecki, F. W. (1978). Intellectual America – Europeans Wrote. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 22(4), 34-35.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 Wojciech Jan Cynarski, John Arthur Johnson
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Os autores que publicam nesta Revista estão de acordo com os seguintes termos:
- Os autores cedem, de forma exclusiva, os direitos de exploração (reprodução, distribuição, comunicação pública, transformação) à Universidade de Léon, podendo estabelecer, em separado, acordos adicionais para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão do artigo publicado na Revista (por exemplo: alojar no repertório institucional ou publicá-lo num livro), com o reconhecimento da publicação inicial nesta Revista.
- O trabalho encontra-se na Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Pode-se consultar aqui o resumo e o texto legal da licença.
- Permite-se, e sugere-se, que os autores difundam electronicamente as versões pré-impressão (versão antes de ser avaliada) e pós-impressão (versão avaliada e aceite para publicação das suas obras antes da sua publicação), favorecendo a sua circulação e difusão, e com ela o possível aumento da sua citação e alcance pela comunidade académica.