A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Political Discourse Analysis: A Case Study of the Former United State Trade Representative Ron Kirk’s Remarks on the Poultry Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18002/sin.v3i2.5260Palabras clave:
political discourse analysis, Pragma-Dialectics, United State Trade Representative, strategic maneuvering.Resumen
Under the research framework of Pragma-
Dialectics, this paper analyses and evaluates the
former United State trade representative Ron
Kirk’s remarks on the trade conflict of poultry.
Through this case study, I intend to develop a
pragma-dialectical approach to the political
discourse. Based on the argumentative
reconstruction, strategic maneuvering analysis
and critical evaluation of the remarks, this
paper finds that even if Ron Kirk’s remarks look
reasonable apparently, there are still some
fallacies hidden in them. In order to make the
US government benefit most from the trade
conflict, after considering comprehensively of
the potential topics, audience demands, and
presentational devices, Ron Kirk maneuvers
strategically by choosing beneficial starting
points and arranging argumentative schemes
technically. By doing so, he can transmit Anti-
China ideology to the international society
imperceptibly. In addition, by taking into
consideration the background information of
the poultry case and the Ten Commandments of
a critical discussion, this paper reveals that, the
accepted starting points and the argument
schemes are abused in Ron Kirk’s remarks.
Through the case study, this paper tries to study
political discourse from Pragma-Dialectical
approach and provide feasible analytical
methods and reasonable evaluative standards
for the political discourse analysis, so that a
new perspective will be offered for researches
on political discourse.
Descargas
Métricas alternativas
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2017 Shi Wen
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Sinologia Hispanica. China Studies Review considers all manuscripts on the strict condition that
- The authors grant on a nonexclusive basis the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication and transformation) of the work accepted for publication to the University of León. The authors can establish, on their own, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), always acknowledging the initial publication in this journal.
- The manuscript is your own original work, and does not duplicate any other previously published work, including your own previously published work.
- The manuscript is not currently under consideration or peer review or accepted for publication or in press or published elsewhere.
- The manuscript contains nothing that is abusive, defamatory, libellous, obscene, fraudulent, or illegal.
- Please note that Sinologia Hispanica uses Turnitin software to screen manuscripts for unoriginal material. By submitting your manuscript to Sinologia Hispanica you are agreeing to any necessary originality checks your manuscript may have to undergo during the peer-review and production processes. Any author who fails to adhere to the above conditions will be rejected.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print versions (version before being evaluated) and / or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, since it favors their circulation and earlier dissemination and with it a possible increase in its citation and scope among the academic community.
Sinologia Hispanica is under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You can read more about this license in versión informativa and texto legal.
